Anti-TLR2 monoclonal antibody [R-PE]

Background: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has improved exfoliative cytology by facilitating the extraction of more precise information from epithelial cells. The aim of this study was to optimize a protocol using a conventional cytobrush to perform LBC, obtaining oral keratinocytes for their further cellular and molecular analysis. Methods: LBC was performed in 30 healthy donors from buccal mucosa. We evaluated the use of diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) medium right after the collection of the cells. Cell morphology and viability were determined by Orcein staining and flow cytometry, respectively. RNA was extracted by the trizol method, and evaluated with spectrometry and electrophoresis. Finally, RNA was copied into cDNA and GAPDH and TLR2 genes were amplified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) using specific primers. Results: Only DEPC-treated DMEM preserved the viability of intact intraepithelial keratinocytes. RNA quantity and quality improves in samples treated with DEPC. RNA integrity is comparable with a cell line control. GAPDH gene was successfully amplified by RT-PCR and RT-qPCR. Conclusions: Therefore, LBC performed under these conditions becomes a reproducible technique for the retrieval of intraepithelial oral keratinocytes with good cell viability for cytomorphometric analysis, and extraction of good RNA quality suitable for molecular analyses such as PCR. We propose this LBC protocol as a complementary method to the cellular and molecular study of oral mucosa pathologies; however, it requires further study.

Purpose The innate immune toll-like receptors 2 (TLR2) and 4 (TLR4) may play a key role in the physiopathology of keratoconus (KC). Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare TLR2/TLR4 expression in corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells between healthy first-degree relatives of patients with KC and healthy controls as well as KC patients. Methods Case-control study in 72 healthy eyes of 36 control subjects, 53 eyes of 27 first-degree relatives, and 109 eyes with KC (60 patients). All participants were subjected to a clinical, topographic, aberrometric, and tomographic examination with extraction of corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells through scraping. TLR2/TLR4 expression was measured by flow cytometry, and was compared among controls, first-degree relatives, and KC patients. The relationship between TLR expression and epidemiological-clinical variables or topographic-aberrometric-tomographic parameters was also analyzed. Results Mean TLR2/TLR4 expression showed a significant gradual increase among groups: controls