Napsin A Expression in Subtypes of Thyroid Tumors: Comparison with Lung Adenocarcinomas
ENDOCRINE PATHOLOGY
Authors: Wu, Jianghua; Zhang, Yanhui; Ding, Tingting; Cheng, Runfen; Gong, Wenchen; Guo, Yuhong; Luo, Ye; Pan, Yi; Zhai, Qiongli; Sun, Wei; Lin, Dongmei; Sun, Baocun
Abstract
Napsin A is widely used in the diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma and has also been reported to be positive in cases of thyroid carcinomas. We investigated napsin A levels through immunohistochemistry on whole sections of 210 primary thyroid tumors of various subtypes and another 41 metastatic thyroid carcinomas, and compared these with 125 primary and 25 metastatic lung adenocarcinomas. The results showed that napsin A was expressed in 23.8% thyroid tumors and 30.3% papillary thyroid carcinomas. Most cases showed a focal and weak to moderate expression. In comparison, 80.8% primary lung adenocarcinomas expressed napsin A, with mostly diffused and strong expression. For metastatic carcinomas of thyroid and lung origin, napsin A was detected in 39.0% of thyroid carcinomas in contrast to 88.0% in cases of lung adenocarcinomas. Comparisons of additional markers, TTF-1, CK7, thyroglobulin, and Pax-8 in metastatic carcinomas showed the overlapping expression of immunomarkers of TTF-1 and CK7. Thyroglobulin and Pax-8 were useful for distinguishing between metastatic carcinomas; however, Pax-8 may be a superior marker due to its higher sensitivity. The clinicopathological analysis of papillary thyroid carcinomas showed that the expression of napsin A was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.030). Here, we focused on the expression of napsin A in thyroid tumors and compared it with that in lung adenocarcinomas. The expression of napsin A is common in thyroid tumors and the combined expression of napsin A and TTF-1 in a metastatic thyroid carcinoma is a cause for concern due to chances of misdiagnosis as lung adenocarcinoma.
DELAYED 131-I FIRST TREATMENT AFTER SURGERY HAS NO IMPACT ON THE MEDIAN TERM OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATE RISK DIFFERENTIATED THYROID CANCER
ENDOCRINE PRACTICE
Authors: Matrone, Antonio; Gambale, Carla; Torregrossa, Liborio; Piaggi, Paolo; Bianchi, Francesca; Valerio, Laura; Viola, David; Agate, Laura; Molinaro, Eleonora; Materazzi, Gabriele; Basolo, Fulvio; Vitti, Paolo; Elisei, Rossella
Abstract
Objective: In intermediate risk (IR) differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, selective use of radioiodine (131-I) for remnant ablation and/or as adjuvant therapy (RRA) is advocated. The recently suggested postoperative evaluation could delay the use of RRA. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a delayed RRA can worsen the clinical outcome of IR-DTC patients. Methods: Four hundred and fourteen consecutive IR-DTC patients were divided according to the time elapsed from surgery to RRA, <6 months (group A, 186/414 [44.9%]), or >= 6 months (group B, 228/414 [55.1%]). Clinical and biochemical data were collected, and clinical outcome was analyzed at the first evaluation (EV) after RRA (first-EV) and after a median of 6 years of follow-up (last-EV). Results: No difference in the clinical outcome of group A and B was found. Since a different activity of 131-I could have an impact on the outcome, we separately analyzed the groups according to the 131-I activity (low-activity group: 1,110 MIN/30 mCi [n = 320], and high-activity group: 3,700 MBq/100 mCi [n = 94]), further subdivided according to the time elapsed from surgery to RRA. No major differences were found in both the low- and high-activity groups when comparing the features of their subgroups A and B, as far as in their clinical outcome. Conclusion: The time elapsed between surgery and the first 131-I treatment does not influence the clinical outcome of IR-DTC patients. This finding allows a more relaxed attitude in the decision making process whether to perform the RRA in IR-DTC cases in which a selective use of 131-I is recommended.