Anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody

Pancreatic cancer is the most lethal malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract. Due to its propensity for early local and distant spread, affected patients possess extremely poor prognosis. Currently applied treatments are not effective enough to eradicate all cancer cells, and minimize their migration. Besides, these treatments are associated with adverse effects on normal cells and organs. These therapies are not able to increase the overall survival rate of patients; hence, finding novel adjuvants or alternatives is so essential. Up to now, medicinal herbs were utilized for therapeutic goals. Herbal-based medicine, as traditional biotherapeutics, were employed for cancer treatment. Of them, apigenin, as a bioactive flavonoid that possesses numerous biological properties (e.g., anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant effects), has shown substantial anticancer activity. It seems that apigenin is capable of suppressing the proliferation of cancer cells via the induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Besides, apigenin inhibits metastasis via down-regulation of matrix metalloproteinases and the Akt signaling pathway. In pancreatic cancer cells, apigenin sensitizes cells in chemotherapy, and affects molecular pathways such as the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1). Herein, the biotherapeutic activity of apigenin and its mechanisms toward cancer cells are presented in the current review to shed some light on anti-tumor activity of apigenin in different cancers, with an emphasis on pancreatic cancer.

Purpose To investigate the safety of pharmaceutically compounded syringes for intravitreal administration of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs. Methods Single center, retrospective chart review. From 2015 to 2019, Oslo University Hospital, Norway gradually implemented pharmaceutical compounding and splitting of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept vials into multiple prefilled syringes for intravitreal use. Medical records of all post-injection endophthalmitis (PIE) cases in this 5-year period were reviewed. The incidences of PIE associated with compounded and clinician-withdrawn syringes were compared. Results In 5 years, the total number of anti-VEGF injections was 112,926; 68,150 procedures (60%) utilized compounded syringes, and 44,776 procedures (40%) utilized clinician-withdrawn syringes. A total of 11 PIE cases were identified (incidence 0.10 per 1000; 95% CI 0.05-0.17). Five PIE cases were associated with compounded syringes (incidence 0.07 per 1000; 95% CI 0.03-0.17); 3 of these were culture positive. Six PIE cases were associated with clinician-withdrawn syringes (incidence 0.13 per 1000; 95% CI 0.06-0.29); 2 of these were culture positive. The relative risk of PIE following procedures utilizing compounded versus clinician-withdrawn syringes was 0.55 (95% CI 0.17-1.79;p= 0.32). Conclusion Use of compounded anti-VEGF drugs in a large clinical setting was not associated with an altered risk of PIE. The finding adds to the evidence that splitting of vials into prefilled syringes for intravitreal injections is safe, provided that an appropriate pharmaceutical compounding procedure is strictly followed.