Bacillus subtilisandEnterococcus faeciumco-fermented feed regulates lactating sow's performance, immune status and gut microbiota
MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
Authors: Wang, Cheng; Wei, Siyu; Xu, Bocheng; Hao, Lihong; Su, Weifa; Jin, Mingliang; Wang, Yizhen
Abstract
Fermented feed (FF) is widely applied to improve swine performance. However, the understandings of the effects of FF on the immune status and gut microbiota of lactating sows and whether probiotics are the effective composition of FF are still limited. The present study aimed to investigate the performance, immune status and gut microbiota of lactating sows fed with a basal diet supplemented withBacillus subtilisandEnterococcus faeciumco-fermented feed (FF), with the probiotic combination (PRO) ofB. subtilisandE. faeciumand control diet (CON) as controls. Compared with the CON group, FF group remarkably improved the average daily feed intake of sows and the weight gain of piglets, while significantly decreased the backfat loss, constipation rate of sows and diarrhoea incidence of piglets. The yield and quality of milk of sows in FF group were improved. Besides, faecal acetate and butyrate were promoted in FF group. Additionally, FF increased the level of IgG, IgM and IL-10 and decreased the concentration of TNF-alpha in serum. Furthermore, FF reduced the abundance ofEnterobacteriaceaeand increased the level ofLactobacillusandSucciniclasticum, which were remarkably associated with growth performance and serum immune parameters. Accordingly, microbial metabolic functions including DNA repair and recombination proteins, glycolysis and gluconeogenesis, mismatch repair andd-alanine metabolism were significantly upregulated, while amino acid metabolism was downregulated in FF group. Overall, the beneficial effects of FF were superior to PRO treatment. Altogether, administration of FF during lactation improved the performance and immune status, and modulated gut microbiota of sows. Probiotics are not the only one effective compound of FF.
Survey of the current status of subclinical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY
Authors: Matsuba, Ikuro; Hatori, Nobuo; Koido, Norihiko; Watanabe, Yoshiyuki; Ebara, Futoshi; Matsuzawa, Yoko; Nishikawa, Tetsuo; Kunishima, Tomoyuki; Degawa, Hisakazu; Nishikawa, Masanori; Ono, Yoshiaki; Kanamori, Akira
Abstract
Objectives: We investigated relationships between subclinical COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) and background factors. Methods: We determined SARS-CoV-2 antibody (IgG) prevalence in 1603 patients, doctors, and nurses in 65 medical institutions in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan and investigated their background factors. Antibodies (IgG) against SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed by Immunochromatographic test. Results: The 39 subjects (2.4%) were found to be IgG antibody-positive: 29 in the patient group (2.9%), 10 in the doctor/nurse group (2.0%), and 0 in the control group. After adjustment for age, sex, and the antibody prevalence in the control group, antibody prevalence was 2.7% in the patient group and 2.1% in the doctor/nurse group. There was no significant difference between the antibody-positive subjects and the antibody-negative subjects in any background factors investigated including overseas travel, contact with overseas travelers, presence/absence of infected individuals in the living area, use of trains 5 times a week or more, BCG vaccination, and use of ACE inhibitor and ARB. Conclusions: Antibody prevalence in the present survey at medical institution is higher than that in Tokyo and in Osaka measured by the government suggesting that subclinical infections are occurring more frequently than expected. No background factor that influenced antibody-positive status due to subclinical infection was identified. (c) 2020 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).